CAPE needs a fair process for addressing serious misconduct while protecting good-faith disagreement. The proposed replacement for By-law 5 gives the General Counsel or a delegate authority to screen out complaints and generally involves the President in decisions about interim measures. It includes safeguards, but I remain concerned about concentrating these responsibilities within the union’s leadership. I oppose the proposal as written. Members need confidence that complaints will be handled independently, consistently and fairly.
A note from Jeremy Solomon.
Discuss this with me →